ArticleScientific reports2022
Applications of machine learning in pine nuts classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attention-enhanced residual autoencoder for NIR spectral feature extraction and classification of grain varieties.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detection Methods for Pine Wilt Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- NIR Sensing Technologies for the Detection of Fraud in Nuts and Nut Products: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A robust and resilience machine learning for forecasting agri-food production.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pine nuts are not only the important agent of pine reproduction and afforestation, but also the commonly consumed nut with high nutritive values. However, it is difficult to distinguish among pine nuts due to the morphological similarity among species. Therefore, it is important to improve the quality of pine nuts and solve the adulteration problem quickly and non-destructively. In this study, seven pine nuts (Pinus bungeana, Pinus yunnanensis, Pinus thunbergii, Pinus armandii, Pinus massoniana, Pinus elliottii and Pinus taiwanensis) were used as study species. 210 near-infrared (NIR) spectra were collected from the seven species of pine nuts, five machine learning methods (Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes (NB)) were used to identify species of pine nuts. 303 images were used to collect morphological data to construct a classification model based on five convolutional neural network (CNN) models (VGG16, VGG19, Xception, InceptionV3 and ResNet50). The experimental results of NIR spectroscopy show the best classification model is MLP and the accuracy is closed to 0.99. Another experimental result of images shows the best classification model is InceptionV3 and the accuracy is closed to 0.964. Four important range of wavebands, 951-957 nm, 1,147-1,154 nm, 1,907-1,927 nm, 2,227-2,254 nm, were found to be highly related to the classification of pine nuts. This study shows that machine learning is effective for the classification of pine nuts, providing solutions and scientific methods for rapid, non-destructive and accurate classification of different species of pine nuts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.