Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614113›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Ultrasensitive detection of salivary SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in individuals with natural and COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity.

Stefani N Thomas, Amy B Karger, Ghaith Altawallbeh, Kathryn M Nelson, David R Jacobs, Jed Gorlin, Helene Barcelo, Bharat Thyagarajan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefani N Thomas *Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1679-5453
Amy B Karger *Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2781-3824
Ghaith Altawallbeh *Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Kathryn M NelsonInstitute for Therapeutics Discovery and Development, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David R JacobsDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-0543
Jed GorlinMemorial Blood Centers-A Division of New York Blood Center Enterprises, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Helene BarceloDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Bharat ThyagarajanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. thya0003@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6968-6985
University of Minnesota · USNew York Blood Center · US

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI BRISCOE, LYNN · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of a highly sensitive immunoassay method based on single molecule array (Simoa) technology to detect IgG and IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) in saliva from individuals with natural or vaccine-induced COVID-19 immunity. The performance of the method was compared to a laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 RBD total antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Paired serum and saliva specimens were collected from individuals (n = 40) prior to and 2 weeks after receiving an initial prime COVID-19 vaccine dose (Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273). Saliva was collected using a commercially available collection device (OraSure Inc.) and SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibodies were measured by an indirect ELISA using concentrated saliva samples and a Simoa immunoassay using unconcentrated saliva samples. The IgG results were compared with paired serum specimens that were analyzed for total RBD antibodies using the ELISA method. The analytical sensitivity of the saliva-based Simoa immunoassay was five orders of magnitude higher than the ELISA assay: 0.24 pg/mL compared to 15 ng/mL. The diagnostic sensitivity of the saliva ELISA method was 90% (95% CI 76.3-97.2%) compared to 91.7% (95% CI 77.5-98.2%) for the Simoa immunoassay without total IgG-normalization and 100% (95% CI 90.3-100%) for the Simoa immunoassay after total IgG-normalization when compared to the serum ELISA assay. When analyzed using the SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibody ELISA, the average relative increase in antibody index (AI) between the saliva of the post- and pre-vaccinated individuals was 8.7 (AI

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansImmunoglobulin ASpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35614113
PMCPMC9132168
OpenAlexW4281486847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.