ArticleScientific reports2022
Humans utilize sensory evidence of others' intended action to make online decisions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful reinforcement history suppresses explicit and implicit error corrections.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Action Feedback Enables Novices to Implicitly Acquire Task Regularities from Experts During Joint Statistical Learning.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantifying mutual hesitation and identifying kinematic predictors in near-collision avoidance in walking.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Partner-sourced haptic feedback rather than environmental inputs drives coordination improvement in human dyadic collaboration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Human intergroup coordination in a hierarchical multi-agent sensorimotor task arises from concurrent co-optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Collective decision making by embodied neural agents.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Interpersonal strategy for controlling unpredictable opponents in soft tennis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Attention-Based Variational Autoencoder Models for Human-Human Interaction Recognition via Generation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Punishment Leads to Greater Sensorimotor Learning But Less Movement Variability Compared to Reward.Neuroscience · 2024Article
- The sensorimotor system modulates muscular co-contraction relative to visuomotor feedback responses to regulate movement variability.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Virtual fashion experiences in virtual reality fashion show spaces.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Learning from humans to build social cognition among robots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We often acquire sensory information from another person's actions to make decisions on how to move, such as when walking through a crowded hallway. Past interactive decision-making research has focused on cognitive tasks that did not allow for sensory information exchange between humans prior to a decision. Here, we test the idea that humans accumulate sensory evidence of another person's intended action to decide their own movement. In a competitive sensorimotor task, we show that humans exploit time to accumulate sensory evidence of another's intended action and utilize this information to decide how to move. We captured this continuous interactive decision-making behaviour with a drift-diffusion model. Surprisingly, aligned with a 'paralysis-by-analysis' phenomenon, we found that humans often waited too long to accumulate sensory evidence and failed to make a decision. Understanding how humans engage in interactive and online decision-making has broad implications that spans sociology, athletics, interactive technology, and economics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.