Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614027›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2022

Towards personalized treatment of T2N0 rectal cancer: A systematic review of long-term oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by local excision.

Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Maria Michela Di Nuzzo, Gianluca Pellino

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Achieving a Cure Without Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Grand challenges in visceral surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roberto PeltriniDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0445-2269
Nicola ImperatoreGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3230-6832
Maria Michela Di NuzzoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gianluca PellinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitell", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-6421
University of Naples Federico II · ITHebron University · PSOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTotal mesorectal excision (TME) remains the treatment of choice in T2N0 tumors. However, evidence suggest that one-size-fits-all approach is not always beneficial for this group of patients. The aim of this study is to synthesize data on long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by local excision (LE) in T2N0 rectal cancer patients in the perspective of a rectal-preserving strategy.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases was conducted until October 2021 to identify studies comparing LE after NAT and TME or reporting oncologic outcomes after conservative approach. A pooled analysis was conducted using a fixed-effect model in the case of non-significant heterogeneity (P > 0.1), and a random effect model (DerSimonian-Laird method) when significant heterogeneity was present (P < 0.1) CRD42022300344.

resultsNine studies were included in the analysis. Three of them were comparative studies. The pooled 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, local and distant recurrence rates were 92.8% (95% CI 81.6-99.5%), 91.3% (95% CI 88.3-94.3%), 96.1% (95% CI 90.5-100%), 72.6% (95% CI 57.5-87.7%), 4% (95% CI 18-63%), and 4.9% (95% CI 2-7.8%), respectively, in subjects treated with NAT followed by LE. No heterogeneity was found for all these analyses, except for the 5-year OS sub-analysis (I

conclusionLE following neoadjuvant CRT may provide comparable survival benefit to radical surgery for patients with clinical stage T2N0 in selected patients although the evidence is still limited to provide solid recommendations. A personalized therapeutic approach taking into account tumor and patient-related factors should be considered.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrecision MedicineTreatment Outcomelocal excisionneoadjuvant therapyorgan preservationrectal cancerT2 tumor

Identifiers

PMID35614027
PMCPMC9545053
OpenAlexW4281569780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.