ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Diagnostic efficacy of serum ST2 in patients with ASC.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and risk and severity of coronary artery disease: a case control study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Postmortem biochemical analysis of soluble ST2 in the pericardial fluid of patients with sudden cardiac death caused by ischemic heart disease: a pilot study.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Multi-Marker Approach in Patients with Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment together with biomarker evaluation may have a predictive and prognostic role in patients qualified for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to hematopoietic and lymphoid malignancies - a pilot study description.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of serum ST2 in patients with ASC.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is closely related to the development of cardiovascular disease, but the level of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the relationship between ST2 and ACS are unclear. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with the acute coronary syndrome were divided into the unstable angina pectoris (USAP) group (n = 65) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) group (n = 58), and the healthy population, without chest pain and with normal coronary CT, was included as a control group (n = 55). Laboratory index levels were collected from each participant. The baseline information was reviewed and analyzed. The binary logistic regression was used to explore the relation of ST2 levels with the occurrence of ACS and NSTEMI, and the diagnostic performance of ST2 for diagnosing ACS or NSTEMI was evaluated using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
resultsThe level of ST2 was found significantly higher in NSTEMI than in USAP and was higher in USAP than in control (p < 0.01). ST2 levels were positively correlated with ALT, AST, and BNP in the control group, were negatively correlated with HGB and TG in the USAP group, and were positively correlated with WBC, GLU, BNP, and Gensini scores in the NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the occurrence of ACS was associated with ST2, BNP, GLU, TC, BUN, WBC, and PLT, and the occurrence of NSTEMI was associated with AST, WBC, LDL-C, and ST2. Meanwhile, ST2 levels achieved good performance for ACS and NSTEMI diagnostician.
conclusionST2 could be used as an auxiliary diagnostic indicator for the occurrence of ACS and NSTEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.