Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613849›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based mental health2022

Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis.

Edoardo Giuseppe Ostinelli, Orestis Efthimiou, Huseyin Naci, Toshi A Furukawa, Stefan Leucht, Georgia Salanti, Laurence Wainwright, Caroline Zangani, Franco De Crescenzo, Katharine Smith and 3 more

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Navigating the Prescription Drug Information System.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What I stand for asBMJ mental health · 2023
    Article
  13. Carpe diem.Evidence-based mental health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Edoardo Giuseppe OstinelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8717-0832
Orestis EfthimiouDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-7572
Huseyin NaciDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-3776
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munchen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4934-4352
Georgia SalantiInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-8508
Laurence WainwrightOxford Precision Psychiatry Lab, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Caroline ZanganiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Franco De CrescenzoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-7763
Katharine SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katherine StevensOxford Precision Psychiatry Lab, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK andrea.cipriani@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-8321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA network meta-analysis (NMA) usually assesses multiple outcomes across several treatment comparisons. The

methodsWe developed this tool following the recommendations on the communication of benefit-risk information from the available literature. We collected and implemented feedback from researchers, statisticians, methodologists, clinicians and people with lived experience of physical and mental health issues.

resultsWe present the

conclusionsThe

Indexed as

HumansPSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID35613849
PMCPMC9811072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.