ArticleBMJ open2022
Factors associated with preferred place of death among older adults: a qualitative interview study in Tama City, Tokyo, Japan.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Motivations for choosing "home" as one's preferred place of death: A scoping review.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyse the cognitive processes involved in the decision-making of older adults who are not in the end-of-life stage regarding the selection of a preferred place of death.
designA qualitative cross-sectional study based on semistructured in-depth interviews. The interview scripts were sectioned by context, then summarised, conceptualised and categorised. Post-categorisation, the relationships between the conceptual factors were examined.
settingTama City, Tokyo, Japan, from November 2015 to March 2016.
participants20 long-term care users and their families or care providers were interviewed about their preferred places of death and the factors behind their decisions.
resultsThree categories based on the preferred place of end-of-life care and death were extracted from the interview transcripts: (A) discouraging the decision of a preferred place of death, (B) enhancing the desire for home death and (C) enhancing the desire for a hospital/long-term care facility death. Category A consists of concerns about the caregiver's health, anxiety about solitary death, and constraints of and concerns about the household budget. Both categories B and C consist of subcategories of reinforcing and inhibiting factors of whether to desire a home death or a hospital/long-term care facility death. If their previous experiences with care at home, a hospital or a care facility were positive, they preferred the death in the same setting. If those experiences were negative, they tend to avoid the death in the same setting.
conclusionsOne's mindset and decision regarding a preferred place of death include the consideration of economic factors, concerns for caregivers, and experiences of care at home or in a hospital/long-term care facility. Furthermore, health professionals need to be aware of the ambivalence of senior citizens to support their end-of-life decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.