Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613759›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Phase 2a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a new 'balanced binocular viewing' treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children age 3-8 years: trial protocol.

Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor, John A Greenwood, Andrew Skilton, Daniel Baker, Siobhan Ludden, Amanda Davis, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Steven C Dakin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03754153 (Phase 2a Two-site Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Safety of and Adherence With a New 'Binocularly Balanced Viewing' Treatment for Unilateral Amblyopia Compared With Standard Treatment in Children Age 3-8 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03754153 nacompletednot on this map

Phase 2a Two-site Randomised Controlled Trial to Determine Safety of and Adherence With a New 'Binocularly Balanced Viewing' Treatment for Unilateral Amblyopia Compared With Standard Treatment in Children Age 3-8 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRan2019 to 2021Enrolled32ConditionsAmblyopiaArmsBalanced Binocular Viewing (BBV), Standard Therapy - Occlusion (patching) or blurring (atropine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annegret Hella Dahlmann-NoorChildren's Clinical Trials Unit, NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK annegret.dahlmann-noor@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-7402-4350
John A GreenwoodExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-0818
Andrew SkiltonNational Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network Coordinating Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9573-372X
Daniel BakerDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-443X
Siobhan LuddenChildren's Clinical Trials Unit, NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Amanda DavisResearch and Development, NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Hakim-Moulay DehbiUniversity College London, London, UK.
Steven C DakinSchool of Optometry, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K024817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatments for amblyopia, the most common vision deficit in children, often have suboptimal results. Occlusion/atropine blurring are fraught with poor adherence, regression and recurrence. These interventions target only the amblyopic eye, failing to address imbalances of cortical input from the two eyes ('suppression'). Dichoptic treatments manipulate binocular visual experience to rebalance input. Poor adherence in early trials of dichoptic therapies inspired our development of balanced binocular viewing (BBV), using movies as child-friendly viewable content. Small observational studies indicate good adherence and efficacy. A feasibility trial is needed to further test safety and gather information to design a full trial. METHODS/ANALYSIS: We will carry out an observer-masked parallel-group phase 2a feasibility randomised controlled trial at two sites, randomising 44 children aged 3-8 years with unilateral amblyopia to either BBV or standard occlusion/atropine blurring, with 1:1 allocation ratio. We will assess visual function at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks. The primary outcome is intervention safety at 16 weeks, measured as change in interocular suppression, considered to precede the onset of potential diplopia. Secondary outcomes include safety at other time points, eligibility, recruitment/retention rates, adherence, clinical outcomes. We will summarise baseline characteristics for each group and assess the treatment effect using analysis of covariance. We will compare continuous clinical secondary endpoints between arms using linear mixed effect models, and report feasibility endpoints using descriptive statistics. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the London-Brighton & Sussex Research Ethics Committee (18/LO/1204), National Health Service Health Research Authority and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. A lay advisory group will be involved with advising on and disseminating the results to non-professional audiences, including on websites of funder/participating institutions and inputting on healthcare professional audience children would like us to reach. Reporting to clinicians and scientists will be via internal and external meetings/conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03754153.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaAtropineClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFeasibility StudiesHumansMotion PicturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState MedicineAtropineOPHTHALMOLOGYPaediatric ophthalmologyStrabismus

Identifiers

PMID35613759
PMCPMC9131062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.