Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613747›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Patient preferences and attitudes towards first choice medical services in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study.

Xinyu Zhao, Junhui Xiao, Huida Chen, Kena Lin, Xiaoman Li, Zhiwen Zeng, Shuyun Huang, Zhikui Xie, Jinlin Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xinyu ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Junhui XiaoInstitute of Health Law and Policy, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Huida ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Kena LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoman LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Zhiwen ZengDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Shuyun HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Zhikui Xie *Shenzhen Administration Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jinlin Du *Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China dujinlin@gdmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9187-3162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the characteristics of Shenzhen residents' preferences and influencing factors regarding their first choice of medical institution at various medical levels, and to understand their attitudes towards community health services.

designCross-sectional survey.

participantsA total of 1612 participants at least 18 years of age were randomly sampled with stratification among 10 districts in Shenzhen. Data were gathered through a self-designed questionnaire. The effective questionnaire response rate was 93.05%. All patients participated in the study voluntarily, provided written informed consent and were able to complete the questionnaire.

main outcome measuresWe measured and compared the participants' expected and actual preferences and influencing factors regarding their first choice of medical service at various medical levels.

resultsMore than 50% of the participants preferred municipal and district hospitals as their first choice, and 27.5% chose medical institutions according to specific circumstances. Univariate analysis indicated that age, education, income, medical insurance, housing conditions and registered permanent residence were significantly associated with the actual and expected preferred first medical institution. The main factors influencing participants' actual and expected preferred medical institution differed. With the actual preferred first medical institution as the dependent variable, education, monthly income, medical technology, convenience and providers' service attitude and medical ethics were the main factors (χ

conclusionThe main factors influencing participants' preferred medical institution and their actual first visit differed. Patients with high education or income or registered permanent residence preferred high-level medical institutions for the first visit.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesPatient PreferenceChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and Questionnairesepidemiologyhealth policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35613747
PMCPMC9174822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.