Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613368›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2022

Rapid 40 kb Genome Construction from 52 Parts through Data-optimized Assembly Design.

John M Pryor, Vladimir Potapov, Katharina Bilotti, Nilisha Pokhrel, Gregory J S Lohman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Scarless one-tube genome assemblyRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A fully synthetic Golden Gate assembly system for engineering aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genome synthesis, assembly, and rebooting of therapeutically useful high G+C% mycobacteriophages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Scaling DNA engineering.Trends in biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The design and engineering of synthetic genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John M PryorResearch Department, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts 01938, United States.
Vladimir PotapovResearch Department, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts 01938, United States.
Katharina BilottiResearch Department, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts 01938, United States.
Nilisha PokhrelResearch Department, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts 01938, United States.
Gregory J S LohmanResearch Department, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts 01938, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0638-7555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large DNA constructs (>10 kb) are invaluable tools for genetic engineering and the development of therapeutics. However, the manufacture of these constructs is laborious, often involving multiple hierarchical rounds of preparation. To address this problem, we sought to test whether Golden Gate assembly (GGA), an

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringSynthetic BiologyCloning, MolecularDNAGenetic VectorsGenomeDNADNA assemblyGolden Gate assemblysynthetic biologyT7 phage

Identifiers

PMID35613368
PMCPMC9208013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.