Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613342›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Quantitative and ultrasensitive in situ immunoassay technology for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva.

Yuchao Chen, Fei Liu, Luke P Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuchao ChenWellSIM Biomedical Technologies Inc., 626 Bancroft Way, Suite A, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0483-7524
Fei LiuWellSIM Biomedical Technologies Inc., 626 Bancroft Way, Suite A, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5259-5753
Luke P LeeHarvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-4054

Funding

The Center for Advancing Point of Care in Heart, Lung, Blood and Sleep DiseasesU54HL143541 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRYAN O BUCHHOLZ, Nathaniel Scott Hafer · 2018 to 2026
$141.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL143541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become an immense global health crisis. However, the lack of efficient and sensitive on-site testing methods limits early detection for timely isolation and intervention. Here, we present a quantitative and ultrasensitive in situ immunoassay technology for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection in saliva (QUIT SARS-CoV-2). Our nanoporous membrane resonator generates a rapid oscillating flow to purify and concentrate fully intact SARS-CoV-2 virus in saliva by 40-fold for in situ detection of viral antigens based on chemiluminescent immunoassay within 20 min. This method can not only achieve a detection sensitivity below 100 copies/ml of virus, comparable to the bench-top PCR equipment; it can also improve detection specificity via direct monitoring of viral loads. The integrated portable QUIT SARS-CoV-2 system, which enables rapid and accurate on-site viral screening with a high-throughput sample pooling strategy, can be performed in primary care settings and substantially improve the detection and prevention of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansImmunoassaySalivaSensitivity and SpecificityTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35613342
PMCPMC9132547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.