Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613252›Full record

ReviewRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2022

Impact of digital social media on the perception of loneliness and social isolation in older adults.

Luciana Kusumota, Maria Angélica Andreotti Diniz, Renato Mendonça Ribeiro, Iara Lesa Costa da Silva, Ana Laura Galhardo Figueira, Fernanda Resende Rodrigues, Rosalina Aparecida Partezani Rodrigues

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Time and Frequency of Social Media Use and Loneliness Among U.S. Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana KusumotaUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Colaborador da OPAS/OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-3722
Maria Angélica Andreotti DinizUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Colaborador da OPAS/OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0596
Renato Mendonça RibeiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Colaborador da OPAS/OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-7367
Iara Lesa Costa da SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Colaborador da OPAS/OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-7247
Ana Laura Galhardo FigueiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Colaborador da OPAS/OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5402-2924
Fernanda Resende RodriguesBolsista do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-2271
Rosalina Aparecida Partezani RodriguesUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Colaborador da OPAS/OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-1078
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto synthesize knowledge about the use of social media and the perception of loneliness and/or social isolation in older adults.

methodintegrative literature review with primary studies published in full, in Portuguese, English or Spanish, between September 2014 and July 2020 in the databases: American Psychological Association Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature databases, Web of Science and PubMed.

results11 articles were included, categorized based on the types of technologies: "the use of the Internet", encompassing social networking sites, the internet and applications; "communication devices", with the use of smartphones, tablets and iPads and "types of communication" covering the use of interpersonal means of communication in the digital age, such as video calls and emails. There were positive results (63.6%) regarding the use of social media to minimize the perception of loneliness and/or social isolation in the older adults.

conclusionthe scientific evidence shows that the use of digital social media can reduce the perception of loneliness and/or isolation in older adults. Furthermore, the internet can favor greater contact between the older adults and family members and can serve as a source of support, provide a greater sense of belonging in the community and reduce loneliness.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial MediaAgedHumansPerceptionSocial IsolationSocial Networking

Identifiers

PMID35613252
PMCPMC9132132
OpenAlexW4285744441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.