Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613218›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Distinct neuronal types contribute to hybrid temporal encoding strategies in primate auditory cortex.

Xiao-Ping Liu, Xiaoqin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct Cortical Populations Drive Multisensory Modulation of Segregated Auditory Sources.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Complex Impact of Stimulus Envelope on Motor Synchronization to Sound.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Distinct Neuron Types Contribute to Hybrid Auditory Spatial Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A Redundant Cortical Code for Speech Envelope.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Ping LiuLaboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3449-7601
Xiaoqin WangLaboratory of Auditory Neurophysiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3999-0772
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

NEURAL BASIS OF COMMUNICATION SOUND PERCEPTIONR01DC003180 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 1997 to 2024
$12.0M
Auditory-Vocal Interaction Mechanisms in PrimatesR01DC005808 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOQIN · 2003 to 2022
$8.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003180NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the encoding of sensory stimuli by the brain often consider recorded neurons as a pool of identical units. Here, we report divergence in stimulus-encoding properties between subpopulations of cortical neurons that are classified based on spike timing and waveform features. Neurons in auditory cortex of the awake marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) encode temporal information with either stimulus-synchronized or nonsynchronized responses. When we classified single-unit recordings using either a criteria-based or an unsupervised classification method into regular-spiking, fast-spiking, and bursting units, a subset of intrinsically bursting neurons formed the most highly synchronized group, with strong phase-locking to sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) that extended well above 20 Hz. In contrast with other unit types, these bursting neurons fired primarily on the rising phase of SAM or the onset of unmodulated stimuli, and preferred rapid stimulus onset rates. Such differentiating behavior has been previously reported in bursting neuron models and may reflect specializations for detection of acoustic edges. These units responded to natural stimuli (vocalizations) with brief and precise spiking at particular time points that could be decoded with high temporal stringency. Regular-spiking units better reflected the shape of slow modulations and responded more selectively to vocalizations with overall firing rate increases. Population decoding using time-binned neural activity found that decoding behavior differed substantially between regular-spiking and bursting units. A relatively small pool of bursting units was sufficient to identify the stimulus with high accuracy in a manner that relied on the temporal pattern of responses. These unit type differences may contribute to parallel and complementary neural codes.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsCallithrixNeuronsWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID35613218
PMCPMC9132345
OpenAlexW4281568511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.