Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613151›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2022

Diversity of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) species and risk factors associated in natural infecting calves at the Southern Agreste Microregion in the State of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Karlla Keyla Ferreira Dos Santos, Lucia Oliveira de Macedo, Ângela Imperiano da Conceição, Lucas Azevedo Dos Santos, Carla Lopes de Mendonça, Leucio Câmara Alves, Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos, Gílcia Aparecida de Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karlla Keyla Ferreira Dos SantosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de Animais de Produção, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0374-5708
Lucia Oliveira de MacedoLaboratório de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco - UFAPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3655-4414
Ângela Imperiano da ConceiçãoClínica de Bovinos de Garanhuns, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-4912
Lucas Azevedo Dos SantosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Sanidade e Reprodução de Animais de Produção, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-3205
Carla Lopes de MendonçaClínica de Bovinos de Garanhuns, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-4985
Leucio Câmara AlvesDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Recife, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-5143
Rafael Antonio Nascimento RamosLaboratório de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco - UFAPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-9358
Gílcia Aparecida de CarvalhoLaboratório de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco - UFAPE, Garanhuns, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-9759
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eimeria species have importance to calves because of the economic losses. The aim of this study was to identify the species of Eimeria that affect calves and the risk factors associated with its natural infection. Fecal samples (387) were collected from dairy farms in the southern Agreste of Pernambuco. The feces were evaluated using the Gordon & Whitlock technique and were cultured in 2.5% potassium dichromate for sporulation of oocysts. Odds ratio (OR) were calculated to assess risk factors. Eimeria spp. were detected in 50.65% (196/387) of the samples. Eleven species were identified, being Eimeria bovis (26.64%; 548/2057), Eimeria zuernii (19.69%; 405/2057) and Eimeria ellipsoidalis (14.49%; 298/2057) those more frequent. Small herds (OR = 1.93), calves aged up to six months (OR = 2.12), absence of manure pit (OR = 7.52), fortnightly cleaning (OR = 4.71), collective calf pens (OR = 3.26), manual milking (OR = 2.16) and absence of veterinary care (OR = 2.28) were considered to be risk factors. The data revealed pathogenic species in more than 50% of the farms. Thus, the importance of adopting sanitary measures to reduce the spread of these protozoa in herds should be done, because of economic losses associated with its infection.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesCoccidiosisEimeriaAnimalsBrazilCattleFecesPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35613151
PMCPMC9901888
OpenAlexW4285270857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.