Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613082›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

A phase II open label clinical study of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ILB® for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Ann Logan, Zsuzsanna Nagy, Nicholas M Barnes, Antonio Belli, Valentina Di Pietro, Barbara Tavazzi, Giuseppe Lazzarino, Giacomo Lazzarino, Lars Bruce, Lennart I Persson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03613571 (A Single-centre, Open Single-arm Study Where the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Subcutaneously Administered ILB Will be Evaluated in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03613571 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Single-centre, Open Single-arm Study Where the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Subcutaneously Administered ILB Will be Evaluated in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorTikoMed ABRan2018 to 2019Enrolled13ConditionsAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisArmsILB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ILBInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. ILBJournal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ann LoganAxolotl Consulting Ltd, Droitwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3215-5042
Zsuzsanna NagyCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Nicholas M BarnesCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Antonio BelliCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Valentina Di PietroCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Barbara TavazziDepartment of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensive and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe LazzarinoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Division of Medical Biochemistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giacomo LazzarinoUniCamillus, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Lars BruceTikomed AB, Viken, Sweden.
Lennart I PerssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an invariably lethal progressive disease, causing degeneration of neurons and muscle. No current treatment halts or reverses disease advance. This single arm, open label, clinical trial in patients with ALS investigated the safety and tolerability of a novel modified low molecular weight dextran sulphate (LMW-DS, named ILB®) previously proven safe for use in healthy volunteers and shown to exert potent neurotrophic effects in pre-clinical studies. Secondary endpoints relate to efficacy and exploratory biomarkers.

methodsThirteen patients with ALS were treated with 5 weekly subcutaneous injections of ILB®. Safety and efficacy outcome measures were recorded weekly during treatment and at regular intervals for a further 70 days. Functional and laboratory biomarkers were assessed before, during and after treatment.

resultsNo deaths, serious adverse events or participant withdrawals occurred during or after ILB® treatment and no significant drug-related changes in blood safety markers were evident, demonstrating safety and tolerability of the drug in this cohort of patients with ALS. The PK of ILB® in patients with ALS was similar to that seen in healthy controls. The ILB® injection elicited a transient elevation of plasma Hepatocyte Growth Factor, a neurotrophic and myogenic growth factor. Following the ILB® injections patients reported increased vitality, decreased spasticity and increased mobility. The ALSFRS-R rating improved from 36.31 ± 6.66 to 38.77 ± 6.44 and the Norris rating also improved from 70.61 ± 13.91 to 77.85 ± 14.24 by Day 36. The improvement of functions was associated with a decrease in muscle atrophy biomarkers. These therapeutic benefits decreased 3-4 weeks after the last dosage.

conclusionsThis pilot clinical study demonstrates safety and tolerability of ILB® in patients with ALS. The exploratory biomarker and functional measures must be cautiously interpreted but suggest clinical benefit and have a bearing on the mechanism of action of ILB®. The results support the drug's potential as the first disease modifying treatment for patients with ALS.

trial registrationEudraCT 2017-005065-47.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBiomarkersCohort StudiesHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35613082
PMCPMC9132272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.