ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2022
Adaptive Models for Multi-Covariate Imaging of Sub-Resolution Targets (MIST).
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-covariate imaging of sub-resolution targets (MIST) is a statistical, model-based image formation technique that smooths speckles and reduces clutter. MIST decomposes the measured covariance of the element signals into modeled contributions from mainlobe, sidelobes, and noise. MIST covariance models are derived from the well-known autocorrelation relationship between transmit apodization and backscatter covariance. During in vivo imaging, the effective transmit aperture often deviates from the applied apodization due to nonlinear propagation and wavefront aberration. Previously, the backscatter correlation length provided a first-order measure of these patient-specific effects. In this work, we generalize and extend this approach by developing data-adaptive covariance estimation, parameterization, and model-formation techniques. We performed MIST imaging using these adaptive models and evaluated the performance gains using 152 tissue-harmonic scans of fetal targets acquired from 15 healthy pregnant subjects. Compared to standard MIST imaging, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is improved by a median of 8.3%, and the speckle signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is improved by a median of 9.7%. The median CNR and SNR gains over B-mode are improved from 29.4% to 40.4% and 24.7% to 38.3%, respectively. We present a versatile empirical function that can parameterize an arbitrary speckle covariance and estimate the effective coherent aperture size and higher order coherence loss. We studied the performance of the proposed methods as a function of input parameters. The implications of system-independent MIST implementation are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.