Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35613051›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

The effect of mutation on an aggregation-prone protein: An in vivo, in vitro, and in silico analysis.

N Guthertz, R van der Kant, R M Martinez, Y Xu, C H Trinh, B I Iorga, F Rousseau, J Schymkowitz, D J Brockwell, S E Radford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global Analysis of Aggregation Determinants in Small Protein Domains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Employing deep mutational scanning in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms and pathology of protein misfolding and aggregation.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Disease-relevant βNature communications · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

N GuthertzAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
R van der KantSwitch Laboratory, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
R M MartinezAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Y XuAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8389-4120
C H TrinhAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
B I IorgaUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS UPR 2301, Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-1350
F RousseauSwitch Laboratory, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J SchymkowitzSwitch Laboratory, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
D J BrockwellAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-5937
S E RadfordAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.

Funding

UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M012573/1Wellcome Trust 094232Wellcome Trust 204963Wellcome Trust 204963/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregation of initially stably structured proteins is involved in more than 20 human amyloid diseases. Despite intense research, however, how this class of proteins assembles into amyloid fibrils remains poorly understood, principally because of the complex effects of amino acid substitutions on protein stability, solubility, and aggregation propensity. We address this question using β2-microglobulin (β2m) as a model system, focusing on D76N-β2m that is involved in hereditary amyloidosis. This amino acid substitution causes the aggregation-resilient wild-type protein to become highly aggregation prone in vitro, although the mechanism by which this occurs remained elusive. Here, we identify the residues key to protecting β2m from aggregation by coupling aggregation with antibiotic resistance in E. coli using a tripartite β-lactamase assay (TPBLA). By performing saturation mutagenesis at three different sites (D53X-, D76X-, and D98X-β2m) we show that residue 76 has a unique ability to drive β2m aggregation in vivo and in vitro. Using a randomly mutated D76N-β2m variant library, we show that all of the mutations found to improve protein behavior involve residues in a single aggregation-prone region (APR) (residues 60 to 66). Surprisingly, no correlation was found between protein stability and protein aggregation rate or yield, with several mutations in the APR decreasing aggregation without affecting stability. Together, the results demonstrate the power of the TPBLA to develop proteins that are resilient to aggregation and suggest a model for D76N-β2m aggregation involving the formation of long-range couplings between the APR and Asn76 in a nonnative state.

Indexed as

Amyloidosisbeta 2-MicroglobulinProtein Aggregation, PathologicalAmino Acid SubstitutionAmyloidogenic Proteinsbeta-LactamasesEnzyme AssaysEscherichia coliHumansPoint MutationProtein FoldingAmyloidogenic Proteinsbeta 2-Microglobulinbeta-Lactamasesaggregationamyloidevolution

Identifiers

PMID35613051
PMCPMC9295795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.