Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35612838›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022

Perceptual Adaptation to Continuous Versus Intermittent Exposure to Spatial Distortions.

Iona R McLean, Tyler S Manning, Emily A Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How small changes to one eye's retinal image can transform the perceived shape of a very familiar object.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iona R McLeanHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
Tyler S ManningHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
Emily A CooperHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Establishing the Limits of Perceptual Inference for Visual MotionF32EY032321 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MANNING, TYLER · 2021 to 2022
$135k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY032321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine perceptual adaptation when people wear spectacles that produce unequal retinal image magnification. Methods: Two groups of 15 participants (10 male; mean age 25.6 ± 4.9 years) wore spectacles with a 3.8% horizontal magnifier over one eye. The continuous-wear group wore the spectacles for 5 hours straight. The intermittent-wear group wore them for five 1-hour intervals. To measure slant and shape distortions produced by the spectacles, participants adjusted visual stimuli until they appeared frontoparallel or equiangular, respectively. Adaptation was quantified as the difference in responses at the beginning and end of wearing the spectacles. Aftereffects were quantified as the difference before and after removing the spectacles. We hypothesized that intermittent wear may lead to visual cue reweighting, so we fit a cue combination model to the data and examined changes in weights given to perspective and binocular disparity slant cues. Results: Both groups experienced significant shape adaptation and aftereffects. The continuous-wear group underwent significant slant adaptation and the intermittent group did not, but there was no significant difference between groups, suggesting that the difference in adaptation was negligible. There was no evidence for cue reweighting in the intermittent wear group, but unexpectedly, the weight given to binocular disparity cues for slant increased significantly in the continuous-wear group. Conclusions: We did not find strong evidence that adaptation to spatial distortions differed between the two groups. However, there may be differences in the cue weighting strategies employed when spectacles are worn intermittently or continuously.

Indexed as

CuesVision DisparityAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultDepth PerceptionEyeglassesHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35612838
PMCPMC9150834
OpenAlexW4281568356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.