ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2022
Cost-effectiveness of adrenal vein sampling- vs computed tomography-guided adrenalectomy for unilateral adrenaloma in primary aldosteronism.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of segmental adrenal venous sampling with radiofrequency ablation for primary aldosteronism in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdrenalectomies performed for the treatment of primary aldosteronism due to unilateral adenoma are traditionally confirmed with, and guided by, results from adrenal vein sampling (AVS). However, the usefulness of AVS at the expense of cost and complications is debated, and many institutions have independent protocols that use AVS to varying degrees.
methodsCost-effectiveness of AVS- vs computed tomography (CT)-based adrenalectomy was calculated using decision tree models. The tree was populated with values describing biochemical post-operative outcomes from the published literature; patients were placed into AVS- or CT-dependent treatment arms. Biochemical outcomes were defined based on patients' potassium levels and aldosterone-renin ratios. Patients underwent adrenalectomies and received medical management dosed based on surgical outcomes. Costs were represented by Medicare (FY2021) reimbursement rates (US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published morbidity and survival data. A willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY gained was set to determine the most cost-effective strategy. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) associated with biochemical outcomes.
resultsThe base case analyses favored the use of AVS-guided care, which cost $307.65 more but yielded 0.78 more QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $392.57. These results were upheld by all one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses. In 100,000 random-sampling simulations, AVS-guided care was favored 100% of the time.
conclusionsFor patients with primary aldosteronism receiving adrenalectomies with curative intent, the more cost-effective method based on biochemical outcomes is AVS-based care. Recent literature suggests biochemical resolution should be favored over clinical resolution, due to long-term detriments of increased aldosterone independent of clinical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.