ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Meta-analyses on the Periodontal Archaeome.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stage-Associated Subgingival Dysbiosis Across the Periodontal Disease Spectrum in a Thai Cohort.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Article
- Host-pathogen interactions in periodontitis: an integrative interkingdom perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Interaction of the Systemic Inflammatory State, Inflammatory Mediators, and the Oral Microbiome.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, we have published a scoping review on the oral archaeome, showing that these microorganisms inhabit various oral niches, including periodontal sites. In order to reinforce the importance of the Archaea domain and alert the scientific community about the importance of inter-domain relationships in oral dysbiosis, we have performed meta-analyses evaluating the prevalence of archaea in periodontal diseases (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020213109). A systematic search in the literature was conducted in several databases and in grey literature, retrieving 30 reports on periodontal archaeome, published from 1980 to 2020. The methodological quality of included studies and the certainty of evidence were evaluated by using validated tools. Most studies focused on the detection of methanogens, revealing that the diversity of the periodontal archaeome is currently underestimated. Two meta-analyses concluded that individuals with periodontitis are prone to have archaeal-positive subgingival biofilms when compared to periodontally healthy individuals (OR 6.68, 95% CI 4.74-9.41 for 16S rRNA gene analysis and OR 9.42, 95% CI 2.54-34.91 for mcrA gene analysis). Despite the archaeal enrichment in sites with periodontitis, less than half of the individuals with periodontitis tested positive for archaeal DNA (general estimative of 46%; 95% CI 36-56%). Conventional treatment for periodontitis reduced the archaeal population, but systemic antibiotics used as adjunctive therapy did not increase its effectiveness. Hence, it could conceivably be hypothesised that archaea are secondary colonizers of areas with dysbiosis, probably flourishing in the inflammatory environment. Due to their lower prevalence, archaeal cells are probably underestimated by the current detection protocols. It may also be speculated that archaea do not have a single central role in the infection, with bacterial cells directly involved in that role. New studies are necessary, with different methodological approaches, to explore the underestimated diversity of the oral archaeome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.