Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35612765›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2022

Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?

Andrea Discalzi, Claudio Maglia, Fernanda Ciferri, Andrea Mancini, Lorenzo Gibello, Marco Calandri, Gianfranco Varetto, Paolo Fonio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea DiscalziDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. andreadiscalzi@gmail.com.
Claudio MagliaDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Fernanda CiferriDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Andrea ManciniDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo GibelloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Marco CalandriDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Gianfranco VarettoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Paolo FonioDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present our experience and provide a literature review dissertation about the use of a suture-mediated percutaneous closure device (Perclose Proglide -PP- Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) to achieve hemostasis for unintended subclavian arterial catheterization during central venous line placement. MATERIALS &

methodsSince October 2020, we have successfully treated four consecutive patients with a central venous catheter (8 to 12 French) in the subclavian artery. In each patient, we released a PP, monitoring its efficacy by performing a subclavian angiogram and placing, as a rescue strategy, an 8 mm balloon catheter near the entry point of the misplaced catheter. Primary outcome is technical and clinical success. Technical success is defined as absence of bleeding signs at completion angiography, while clinical success is a composite endpoint defined as absence of hematoma, hemoglobin loss at 12 and 24 h, and absence of procedure-related reintervention (due to vessel stenosis, pseudoaneurysm or distal embolization).

resultsTechnical success was obtained in 75% of cases. In one patient a mild extravasation was resolved after 3 min of balloon catheter inflation. No early complications were observed for all patients.

conclusionsPP showed a safe and effective therapeutic option in case of unintentional arterial cannulation. It can be considered as first-line strategy, as it does not preclude the possibility to use other endovascular approaches in case of vascular closure device failure.

Indexed as

Central venous catheterisationEndovascular repairSubclavian artery injuriesVascular closure device, Perclose Proglide

Identifiers

PMID35612765
PMCPMC9133280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.