Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35612741›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Glycopeptide-Centric Approaches for the Characterization of Microbial Glycoproteomes.

Nichollas E Scott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nichollas E ScottDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. nichollas.scott@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein glycosylation is increasingly recognized as a common class of modifications within microbial species that can shape protein functions and the proteome at large. Due to this, there is an increasing need for robust analytical methods, which allow for the identification and characterization of microbial glycopeptides from proteome samples in a high-throughput manner. Using affinity-based enrichment (either hydrophilicity or antibody-based approaches) glycopeptides can easily be separated from non-glycosylated peptides and analyzed using mass spectrometry. By utilizing multiple mass spectrometry fragmentation approaches and open searching-based bioinformatic techniques, novel glycopeptides can be identified and characterized without prior knowledge of the glycans used for glycosylation. Using these approaches, glycopeptides within samples can rapidly be identified as well as quantified to understand how glycosylation changes in response to stimuli or how changes in glycosylation systems impact the glycoproteome. This chapter outlines a set of robust protocols for the initial preparation, enrichment, and analysis of microbial glycopeptides for both qualitative and quantitative glycoproteomic studies. Using these approaches, glycosylation events can be easily identified by researchers without the need for extensive manual analysis of proteomic datasets.

Indexed as

GlycopeptidesProteomicsGlycosylationMass SpectrometryProteomeGlycopeptidesProteomeCollision-induced dissociation (CID)Electron-Transfer/Higher-Energy Collision Dissociation (EThcD)Glycopeptide enrichmentHigher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD)Mass spectrometryZwitterionic hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (ZIC-HILC)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.