Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35612720›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2022

Sentinel node navigation surgery in cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosuke Yoshihara, Masahiro Kagabu, Satoru Nagase, Hidetaka Katabuchi, Mikio Mikami, Tsutomu Tabata, Yasuyuki Hirashima, Yoichi Kobayashi, Masanori Kaneuchi and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuyuki Chiyoda *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-2242
Kosuke Yoshihara *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2254-3378
Masahiro KagabuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Shiwa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0926-1015
Satoru NagaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-1128
Hidetaka KatabuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-6134
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-3518
Tsutomu TabataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-8180
Yasuyuki HirashimaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0269-9313
Yoichi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8474-0625
Masanori KaneuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otaru General Hospital, Otaru, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2479-1164
Hideki TokunagaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1622-3810
Tsukasa BabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Shiwa, Japan. babatsu@iwate-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0066-3747
Iwate Medical University · JPKeio University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyorin University · JPNiigata University · JPOtaru Municipal Hospital · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPTohoku University · JPTokai University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is used in clinical practice for the treatment of cervical cancer. This study aimed to elucidate the appropriate sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping method and assess the safety and benefits of SNNS. We searched the PubMed, Ichushi, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and studies on SLN in cervical cancer from January 2012 to December 2020. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We quantitatively analyzed the detection rate, sensitivity/specificity, and complications and reviewed information, including the survival data of SLN biopsy (SLNB) without pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). The detection rate of SLN mapping in the unilateral pelvis was median 95.7% and 100% and in the bilateral pelvis was median 80.4% and 90% for technetium-99 m (Tc) with/without blue dye (Tc w/wo BD) and indocyanine green (ICG) alone, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of each tracer were high; the area under the curve of each tracer was 0.988 (Tc w/wo BD), 0.931 (BD w/wo Tc), 0.966 (ICG), and 0.977 (carbon nanoparticle). Morbidities including lymphedema, neurological symptoms and blood loss were associated with PLND. One RCT and five studies all showed SNNS without systematic PLND does not impair recurrence or survival in early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size ≤ 2-4 cm. Both Tc w/wo BD and ICG are appropriate SLN tracers. SNNS can reduce the morbidities associated with PLND without affecting disease progression in early-stage cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph NodeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsColoring AgentsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenCervical cancerMeta-analysisMinimally invasive surgerySentinel lymph nodeSentinel node navigation surgerySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35612720
OpenAlexW4281559476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.