ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
Surgeons preferences in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Saudi Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Performance outcomes from a DMEK peeling and preparation wet lab.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore the attitudes, preferences, and barriers of DMEK among corneal specialists in Saudi Arabia.
methodAn anonymous survey was sent through an online platform to members of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The survey was designed to capture data covering: demographic data, practice patterns of keratoplasty techniques, DMEK technique preferences, barriers, and facilitators to performing DMEK.
resultsThirty-five (33% response rate) surgeons participated in the questionnaire. Sixty-eight percent were in practice for less than or equal to 10 years. Thirteen surgeons were performing DMEK. Participating in any training capacity was observed among surgeons who performed DMEK (92%). The main selection criteria for this procedure were patients with normal anterior chamber anatomy (77%). The main barrier against DMEK adoption among surgeons who do not perform the procedure was the lack of experience (91%). Strategies to help begin performing DMEK were eye banks support (prepared grafts, backup tissue for inadvertent loss), access to wet-lab training courses, and higher surgical volume.
conclusionDMEK is not highly performed among corneal specialists in Saudi Arabia; however, there is evident interest in adopting this technique. Strategies toward filling the gap of lacking experience would facilitate the adoption of the procedure. Eye banks play a crucial role by providing prepared tissues, which would lessen part of the technical difficulty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.