Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35612671›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2022

The return of RET GateKeeper mutations? an in-silico exploratory analysis of potential resistance mechanisms to novel RET macrocyclic inhibitor TPX-0046.

Matteo Repetto, Edoardo Crimini, Liliana Ascione, Luca Boscolo Bielo, Carmen Belli, Giuseppe Curigliano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The heterogeneous transition state of resistance to RET kinase inhibitors converges on ERK1/2-driven Aurora A/B kinases.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo RepettoDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo CriminiDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-0607
Liliana AscioneDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca Boscolo BieloDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carmen BelliDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDivision of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Giuseppe.curigliano@ieo.it.
University of Milan · ITOspedale San Giuseppe · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TPX-0046 is designed to overcome resistance to FDA approved RET inhibitors Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib. Early prediction of resistance mechanisms to investigational drugs may facilitate subsequent drug and trial designs. This study aims to predict potential mutations inducing resistance to TPX-0046. We conducted an in-silico analysis of TPX-0046 macrocyclic structure and predicted the binding mode on RET. We used as reference literary examples of resistance mechanisms to other macrocyclic inhibitors (Lorlatinib on ALK/ROS1) to construct RET secondary resistance mutations. We conducted docking simulations to evaluate impact of mutations on TPX-0046 binding. TPX-0046 binding mode on RET appears to not be influenced by Solventfront G810X mutation presence. Bulky Gatekeeper V804X mutations affect predicted TPX-0046 binding mode. Mutations in Beta 7 strand region L881F and xDFG S891L impair TPX-0046 docking. Our findings suggest that development of second generation RET inhibitors focused mainly on Solventfront G810X mutations granting resistance to selective RET inhibitors Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib. If these findings are confirmed by identification of Gatekeeper V804X mutations in patients progressing to TPX-0046, explanation of acquired resistance and loss of benefit will be easier These findings might accelerate development of third generation RET inhibitors, as well as clinical trial design in precision oncology settings.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMutationPrecision MedicineProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanDrug resistanceMolecular tumor boardPrecision oncologyRET inhibitorTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID35612671
OpenAlexW4281489859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.