ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022
Robotic retromuscular abdominal wall repair using an inverted TEP (iTEP) approach: surgical technique and short-term outcomes.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic primary ventral hernia repair-a multi-national Delphi expert consensus.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive Rives-Stoppa (MIRS) technique: a technique of retromuscular repair of ventral hernias preserving the posterior rectus sheath.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Robot-assisted Enhanced-view Totally Extraperitoneal (eTEP) and Transabdominal Retromuscular (TARM aka TARUP) Ventral Hernia Mesh Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Review
- Using the Da Vinci Single Port Robotic Platform in Abdominal Wall Surgery: Preclinical Exploration of a Suprapubic Single Port Extraperitoneal Approach (SPJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Robot Assisted Trans Abdominal Retromuscular Umbilical Prosthesis (rTARUP): A Dutch Multicenter Study.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
- Robotic trans-abdominal retromuscular hernia repair for medium-sized midline hernias: midterm outcomes and surgical site occurrence (SSO) analysis in 120 patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic-assisted endoscopic onlay repair (R-ENDOR) for concomitant ventral hernias and diastasis recti: initial results and surgical technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Switching from robotic-assisted extended transabdominal preperitoneal (eTAPP) to totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobotic retromuscular abdominal wall repair (RAWR) for ventral hernias can be performed transabdominal or extraperitoneal by using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). For defects in the meso- or epigastric region, an inverted approach can be used, starting the development of the totally extraperitoneal plane in the suprapubic region and progressing in a caudal-to-cranial direction (inverted TEP, iTEP). The aim of the study is to present the surgical technique and to report the short-term outcomes.
methodsA retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed, including patients who underwent a robotic RAWR using the iTEP approach between December 2019 and January 2022. The surgical technique was described, and patients' characteristics and intra- and postoperative parameters were studied and compared to the TARUP technique (robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair).
resultsThirty-four patients were treated with an iTEP approach, and 14 patients underwent a TARUP procedure. The median length of stay was 1 day (range 1-3), and there were no intraoperative complications in both groups. One patient (3%) required reoperation after an iTEP approach for a small bowel internal herniation due to a rupture of the posterior rectus sheath. There were no recurrences or mortality with a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-29) in the iTEP group, compared to 35 months (range 29-37) in the TARUP group.
conclusionFor defects in the upper abdominal region, a robotic RAWR with an iTEP approach appears to be safe and feasible. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the late recurrence rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.