Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35612326›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2022

Landmark Discoveries and Recent Advances in Type IV Pilus Research.

Pradip Kumar Singh, Janay Little, Michael S Donnenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Expression of soluble Type IV Minor Pilins and isolation of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Type IV pilin regulation: a transcriptional overview.Critical reviews in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Type IV pili ofEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pradip Kumar SinghVirginia Commonwealth Universitygrid.224260.0, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Janay LittleVirginia Commonwealth Universitygrid.224260.0, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Michael S DonnenbergVirginia Commonwealth Universitygrid.224260.0, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-3184

Funding

Structure & Function of Clostridium difficile Type IV PiliR01AI114902 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SUNDBERG, ERIC JOHN · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type IV pili (T4P) are retractable multifunctional nanofibers present on the surface of numerous bacterial and archaeal species. Their importance to microbiology is difficult to overstate. The scientific journey leading to our current understanding of T4P structure and function has included many innovative research milestones. Although multiple T4P reviews over the years have emphasized recent advances, we find that current reports often omit many of the landmark discoveries in this field. Here, we attempt to highlight chronologically the most important work on T4P, from the discovery of pili to the application of sophisticated contemporary methods, which has brought us to our current state of knowledge. As there remains much to learn about the complex machine that assembles and retracts T4P, we hope that this review will increase the interest of current researchers and inspire innovative progress.

Indexed as

BacteriaFimbriae, BacterialArchaea20th century history21st century historybacterial fimbriaeelectron microscopyfimbrial proteinsmulticomponent complexesreviewtimelinetransformationtype 4 pilitype IV pili

Identifiers

PMID35612326
PMCPMC9491203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.