Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611997›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

Population pharmacokinetic model for once-daily intravenous busulfan in pediatric subjects describing time-associated clearance.

Rachael Lawson, Christine E Staatz, Christopher J Fraser, Shanti Ramachandran, Lochie Teague, Richard Mitchell, Tracey O'Brien, Stefanie Hennig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachael LawsonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-5396
Christine E StaatzSchool of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christopher J FraserBlood and Marrow Transplant Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Shanti RamachandranOncology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Lochie TeaguePediatric Blood and Cancer Centre, Starship Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard MitchellKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Tracey O'BrienKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Stefanie HennigCertara, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5972-3711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of busulfan focusing on how busulfan clearance (CL) changes over time during once-daily administration and assess different methods for measuring busulfan exposure and the ability to achieve target cumulative exposure under different dosing adjustment scenarios in pediatric stem cell transplantation recipients. Daily serial blood sampling was performed and concentration-time data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach. The developed PK model was used to assess achievement of target exposure under six dose-adjustment scenarios based on simulations performed in RStudio (RxODE package)®. A total of 2491 busulfan plasma concentration-time measurements were collected from 95 patients characterizing 379 dosing days. A two-compartment model with time-associated CL best described the data with a typical CL of 14.5 L/h for an adult male with 62 kg normal fat mass (NFM; equivalent to 70 kg total body weight), typical volume of distribution central compartment (V1) of 40.6 L/59 kg NFM (equivalent to 70 kg total body weight), and typical volume of distribution peripheral compartment of 3.57 L/62 kg NFM. Model interindividual variability in CL and V1 was 14.7% and 34.9%, respectively, and interoccasional variability in CL was 6.6%. Patient size described by NFM, a maturation component, and time since start of treatment significantly influenced CL. Simulations demonstrated that using model-based exposure estimates with each dose, and either a proportional dose-adjustment calculation or model-based calculated individual CL estimates to support dose adjustments, increased proportion of subjects attaining cumulative exposure within 5% of target compared with using noncompartmental analysis (100% vs. 0%). A time-associated reduction in CL during once-daily busulfan treatment was described.

Indexed as

BusulfanAdministration, IntravenousAdultBody WeightChildHumansKineticsMaleBusulfan

Identifiers

PMID35611997
PMCPMC9381908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.