Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611959›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Stefanie Engert, Gabriella R Sterne, Davi D Bock, Kristin Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Connectomic mapping of pharyngeal and gut sensory circuits in adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. A gut-brain-gut interoceptive circuit loop gates sugar ingestion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. eLife · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefanie EngertUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-8116
Gabriella R SterneUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7221-648X
Davi D BockJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-7926
Kristin ScottUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-7210

Funding

Processing Gustatory Information in the Fly BrainR01DC013280 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SCOTT, KRISTIN E · 2013 to 2022
$2.9M
Automating whole brain connectomics: development, validation, and application of an open toolkitRF1MH120679 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BOCK, DAVI · 2019 to 2019
$1.9M
Generation of feeding decisions in the fly brainF32DK117671 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI STERNE, GABRIELLA ROSE · 2018 to 2020
$192k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013280NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK117671NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH120679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gustatory sensory neurons detect caloric and harmful compounds in potential food and convey this information to the brain to inform feeding decisions. To examine the signals that gustatory neurons transmit and receive, we reconstructed gustatory axons and their synaptic sites in the adult

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterSensory Receptor CellsTasteDrosophila ProteinschemosensoryD. melanogastergustatoryneural circuitsneurosciencesynapses

Identifiers

PMID35611959
PMCPMC9170244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.