Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611939›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022

Prognostic score model based on six m6A-related autophagy genes for predicting survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Funan Chen, Erxiu Gong, Jun Ma, Jiehuan Lin, Canxing Wu, Shanshan Chen, Shuqiao Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Autophagy: a critical mechanism of NCell death & disease · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The diverse role of RNA methylation in esophageal cancer.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023
    Review
  6. Novel Insights into The Roles of NInternational journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funan ChenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.
Erxiu GongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.
Jiehuan LinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.
Canxing WuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.
Shanshan ChenPriority Ward, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.
Shuqiao HuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Longyan City, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-6818
Longyan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic signatures based on autophagy genes have been proposed for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Autophagy genes are closely associated with m6A genes. Our purpose is to identify m6A-related autophagy genes in ESCC and develop a survival prediction model.

methodsDifferential expression analyses for m6A genes and autophagy genes were performed based on TCGA and HADd databases followed by constructing a co-expression network. Uni-variable Cox regression analysis was performed for m6A-related autophagy genes. Using the optimal combination of feature genes by LASSO Cox regression model, a prognostic score (PS) model was developed and subsequently validated in an independent dataset.

resultsThe differential expression of 13 m6A genes and 107 autophagy genes was observed between ESCC and normal samples. The co-expression network contained 13 m6A genes and 96 autophagy genes. Of the 12 m6A-related autophagy genes that were significantly related to survival, DAPK2, DIRAS3, EIF2AK3, ITPR1, MAP1LC3C, and TP53 were used to construct a PS model, which split the training set into two risk groups with significant different survival ratios (p = 0.015, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year AUC = 0.873, 0.840, and 0.829). Consistent results of GSE53625 dataset confirmed predictive ability of the model (p = 0.024, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year AUC = 0.793, 0.751, and 0.744). The six-gene PS score was an independent prognostic factor from clinical factors (HR, 2.362; 95% CI, 1.390-7.064; p-value = 0.012).

conclusionOur study recommends 6 m6A-related autophagy genes as promising prognostic biomarkers and develops a PS model to predict survival in ESCC.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAutophagyBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, Tumorautophagyco-expression networkm6A methylationprognostic score

Identifiers

PMID35611939
PMCPMC9279981
OpenAlexW4281477070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.