Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611757›Full record

ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2022

Recovery after long-term summer drought: Hydraulic measurements reveal legacy effects in trunks of Picea abies but not in Fagus sylvatica.

T Knüver, A Bär, A Ganthaler, T Gebhardt, T E E Grams, K-H Häberle, B D Hesse, A Losso, I Tomedi, S Mayr and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

T KnüverDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-9008
A BärDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
A GanthalerDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
T GebhardtTechnical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Professorship for Land Surface-Atmosphere Interactions AG Ecophysiology of Plants, Freising, Germany.
T E E GramsTechnical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Professorship for Land Surface-Atmosphere Interactions AG Ecophysiology of Plants, Freising, Germany.
K-H HäberleTechnical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Chair of Restoration Ecology, Freising, Germany.
B D HesseTechnical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Professorship for Land Surface-Atmosphere Interactions AG Ecophysiology of Plants, Freising, Germany.
A LossoDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
I TomediDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
S MayrDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
B BeikircherDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · ATTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3724the Austrian Science Fund I 3724-B32the Austrian Science Fund I 4918the Austrian Science Fund J 4300the Austrian Science Fund P 32203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of summer droughts. Sufficient drought resistance, the ability to acclimate to and/or recover after drought, is thus crucial for forest tree species. However, studies on the hydraulics of mature trees during and after drought in natura are scarce. In this study, we analysed trunk water content (electrical resistivity: ER) and further hydraulic (water potential, sap flow density, specific hydraulic conductivity, vulnerability to embolism) as well as wood anatomical traits (tree ring width, conduit diameter, conduit wall reinforcement) of drought-stressed (artificially induced summer drought via throughfall-exclusion) and unstressed Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica trees. In P. abies, ER indicated a strong reduction in trunk water content after 5 years of summer drought, corresponding to significantly lower pre-dawn leaf water potential and xylem sap flow density. Vulnerability to embolism tended to be higher in drought-stressed trees. In F. sylvatica, only small differences between drought-stressed and control trees were observed. Re-watering led to a rapid increase in water potentials and xylem sap flow of both drought-stressed trees, and to increased growth rates in the next growing season. ER analyses revealed lower trunk water content in P. abies trees growing on throughfall-exclusion plots even 1 year after re-watering, indicating a limited capacity to restore internal water reserves. Results demonstrated that P. abies is more susceptible to recurrent summer drought than F. sylvatica, and can exhibit long-lasting and pronounced legacy effects in trunk water reserves.

Indexed as

AbiesFagusPiceaPinusDroughtsSeasonsTreesWaterWaterclimate changedrought legacydrought recoveryelectrical resistivity tomographyforest droughttree hydraulicstree water storage

Identifiers

PMID35611757
PMCPMC10084041
OpenAlexW4281480421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.