Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611534›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Present and future distribution of bat hosts of sarbecoviruses: implications for conservation and public health.

Renata L Muylaert, Tigga Kingston, Jinhong Luo, Maurício Humberto Vancine, Nikolas Galli, Colin J Carlson, Reju Sam John, Maria Cristina Rulli, David T S Hayman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Developing One Health surveillance systems.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Renata L MuylaertMassey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-6210
Tigga KingstonTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3552-5352
Jinhong LuoCentral China Normal University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Maurício Humberto VancineSão Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9650-7575
Nikolas GalliPolitecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6746-5350
Colin J CarlsonGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6960-8434
Reju Sam JohnMassey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Maria Cristina RulliPolitecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
David T S HaymanMassey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-3015
Massey University · NZPolitecnico di Milano · ITCentral China Normal University · CNGeorgetown University · USTexas Tech University · USUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global changes in response to human encroachment into natural habitats and carbon emissions are driving the biodiversity extinction crisis and increasing disease emergence risk. Host distributions are one critical component to identify areas at risk of viral spillover, and bats act as reservoirs of diverse viruses. We developed a reproducible ecological niche modelling pipeline for bat hosts of SARS-like viruses (subgenus

Indexed as

ChiropteraVirusesAnimalsCOVID-19HumansPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2climate changediversityecological niche modelsforecastingSARS-like coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID35611534
PMCPMC9130791
OpenAlexW4281551404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.