ArticleCancer science2022
Real-world outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer in Japan: A post-marketing surveillance.
Article in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and effectiveness of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer in real-world clinical practice: a postmarketing study in Japan.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
- [Research Progress of Anti-lung Cancer Drug-related Interstitial Lung Disease].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Review
- Network pharmacology study to explore the multiple molecular mechanism of SH003 in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Observational
- Real-world outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer in Japan: A post-marketing surveillance.Cancer science · 2022Article
- First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced NSCLC With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression Greater Than or Equal to 50%: Real-World Study Including Older Patients in Japan.JTO clinical and research reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated in Japan to identify factors affecting the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. This PMS was conducted from December 2016 to June 2019 at 717 centers across Japan. Patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line (1L) treatment for PD-L1-expressing tumors (Tumor Proportion Score [TPS] ≥ 50%) or second-line or later (2L+) treatment for tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1% were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Of 2805 registered patients, 2740 and 2400 comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. The median age (range) was 69 (27-92) years; 55.7% and 29.2% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AEOSIs), respectively. More common AEOSIs included interstitial lung disease, endocrine disorders, liver dysfunction, colitis/severe diarrhea, infusion reactions, and severe skin disorders. The frequency of experiencing ≥2 AEOSIs was low (1L, 6.5%; 2L+, 2.8%). Most AEOSIs occurred within 150 days after initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy. At 1-year follow-up, the objective response rate was 39.2% (1L, 51.5%; 2L+, 30.0%). In conclusion, the 1-year safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC as 1L treatment for tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and 2L+ treatment for tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1% were similar to those reported in phase 2/3 trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.