Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611372›Full record

ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2022

To Button or Not to Button? Primary Gastrostomy Tubes Offer No Significant Advantage Over Buttons.

Hector Osei, Armando Salim Munoz-Abraham, Alice Martino, Kaveer Chatoorgoon, Jose Greenspon, Colleen Fitzpatrick, Gustavo A Villalona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hector OseiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-2696
Armando Salim Munoz-AbrahamDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1168-6867
Alice MartinoDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-8070
Kaveer ChatoorgoonDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-1448
Jose GreensponDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4809-9057
Colleen FitzpatrickDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7460-4980
Gustavo A VillalonaDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9338-5258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Outcomes between primary gastrostomy tubes and buttons (G-tube and G-button) have not been established in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that primary G-tube have decreased complications when compared to G-button. Methods: A retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy devices from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes and 90-day complications. We divided the patients into primary G-tube and primary G-button. Results: Of 265 patients, 142 (53.6%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of surgery were 7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2-44 months) and 6.70 kg (IQR, 3.98-14.15 kg), respectively. Among the groups, G-tube had 80 patients (30.2%) while G-button 185 patients (69.8%). There were 153 patients with at least one overall complication within 90 days postoperative. There was no significant difference in overall complications between groups (G-tube 63.8% vs. G-button 55.7%, Conclusion: Primary G-tube offers no significant advantage in overall, minor or major complications when compared to primary G-button.

Indexed as

ButtonsGastrostomyNutritionPediatricTubes

Identifiers

PMID35611372
PMCPMC9110846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.