Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611302›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Tumor deformation correction for an image guidance system in breast conserving surgery.

Winona L Richey, Jon Heiselman, Morgan Ringel, Ingrid M Meszoely, Michael I Miga

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Winona L RicheyVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Jon HeiselmanVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Morgan RingelVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Ingrid M MeszoelyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Nashville, TN USA.
Michael I MigaVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Deformation Corrected Image Guided Laparoscopic Liver SurgeryR01EB027498 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JARNAGIN, WILLIAM ROBERT, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
Training Program for Innovative Engineering Research in Surgery and InterventionT32EB021937 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Dario J Englot, Michael Ian Miga · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
Replacement and Upgrade of a 3T MR Scanner for ResearchS10OD021771 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2016 to 2016
$2.0M
A Computational Model-Enhanced Approach for Tumor Localization During LumpectomyR21EB022380 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MESZOELY, INGRID M, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2016 to 2017
$411k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027498NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022380NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021937NIH HHS S10 OD021771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and surgical resection is standard of care for the majority of breast cancer patients. Unfortunately, current reoperation rates are 10-29%. Uncertainty in lesion localization is one of the main factors contributing to these high reoperation rates. This work uses the linearized iterative boundary reconstruction approach to model patient breast deformation due to abduction of the ipsilateral arm. A preoperative supine magnetic resonance (MR) image was obtained with the patient's arms down near the torso. A mock intraoperative breast shape was measured from a supine MR image obtained with the patient's arm up near the head. Sparse data was subsampled from the full volumetric image to represent realistic intraoperative data collection: surface fiducial points, the intra-fiducial skin surface, and the chest wall as measured with 7 tracked ultrasound images. The deformed preoperative arm-down data was compared to the ground truth arm-up data. From rigid registration to model correction the tumor centroid distance improves from 7.3 mm to 3.3 mm, average surface fiducial error across 9 synthetic fiducials and the nipple improves from 7.4 ± 2.2 to 1.3 ± 0.7, and average subsurface error across 14 corresponding features improves from 6.2 ± 1.4 mm to 3.5 ± 1.1 mm. Using preoperative supine MR imaging and sparse data in the deformed position, this modeling framework can correct for breast shape changes between imaging and surgery to more accurately predict intraoperative position of the tumor as well as 10 surface fiducials and 14 subsurface features.

Indexed as

biomechanical modelingbreast cancerbreast conserving surgeryimage-guided surgerylumpectomyregistrationsoft tissue deformation

Identifiers

PMID35611302
PMCPMC9126640
OpenAlexW4220833092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.