ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Tumor deformation correction for an image guidance system in breast conserving surgery.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supine magnetic resonance image registration for breast surgery: insights on material mechanics.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and surgical resection is standard of care for the majority of breast cancer patients. Unfortunately, current reoperation rates are 10-29%. Uncertainty in lesion localization is one of the main factors contributing to these high reoperation rates. This work uses the linearized iterative boundary reconstruction approach to model patient breast deformation due to abduction of the ipsilateral arm. A preoperative supine magnetic resonance (MR) image was obtained with the patient's arms down near the torso. A mock intraoperative breast shape was measured from a supine MR image obtained with the patient's arm up near the head. Sparse data was subsampled from the full volumetric image to represent realistic intraoperative data collection: surface fiducial points, the intra-fiducial skin surface, and the chest wall as measured with 7 tracked ultrasound images. The deformed preoperative arm-down data was compared to the ground truth arm-up data. From rigid registration to model correction the tumor centroid distance improves from 7.3 mm to 3.3 mm, average surface fiducial error across 9 synthetic fiducials and the nipple improves from 7.4 ± 2.2 to 1.3 ± 0.7, and average subsurface error across 14 corresponding features improves from 6.2 ± 1.4 mm to 3.5 ± 1.1 mm. Using preoperative supine MR imaging and sparse data in the deformed position, this modeling framework can correct for breast shape changes between imaging and surgery to more accurately predict intraoperative position of the tumor as well as 10 surface fiducials and 14 subsurface features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.