Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611239›Full record

ReviewSN computer science2022

A Survey on Deep Networks Approaches in Prediction of Sequence-Based Protein-Protein Interactions.

Bhawna Mewara, Soniya Lalwani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SN computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bhawna MewaraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Career Point University, Kota, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-2703
Soniya LalwaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Career Point University, Kota, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5757-9744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prominence of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in system biology with diverse biological procedures has become the topic to discuss because it acts as a fundamental part in predicting the protein function of the target protein and drug ability of molecules. Numerous researches have been published to predict PPIs computationally because they provide an alternative solution to laboratory trials and a cost-effective way of predicting the most likely set of interactions at the entire proteome scale. In recent computational methods, deep learning has become a buzzword with numerous scientific researches. This paper presents, for the first time, a comprehensive survey of sequence-based PPI prediction by three popular deep learning architectures i.e. deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks and its variants. The thorough survey discussed herein carefully mined every possible information, can help the researchers to further explore the success in this area.

Indexed as

Deep learningDeep networksLong short term memoryProtein–protein interactionsRecurrent neural network

Identifiers

PMID35611239
PMCPMC9119573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.