Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611143›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2022

Measuring "pain load" during general anesthesia.

Stephen Green, Keerthana Deepti Karunakaran, Delany Berry, Barry David Kussman, Lyle Micheli, David Borsook

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen GreenThe Center for Pain and the Brain, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8388-6043
Keerthana Deepti KarunakaranThe Center for Pain and the Brain, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-9341
Delany BerryThe Center for Pain and the Brain, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-2800
Barry David KussmanThe Center for Pain and the Brain, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-5792
Lyle MicheliDepartments of Orthopedics, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-9332
David BorsookDepartments of Orthopedics, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9825-0064

Funding

Perioperative Measures of Nociception using NIRSR01GM122405 · NIGMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KUSSMAN, BARRY DAVID · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) allows for ongoing measures of brain functions during surgery. The ability to evaluate cumulative effects of painful/nociceptive events under general anesthesia remains a challenge. Through observing signal differences and setting boundaries for when observed events are known to produce pain/nociception, a program can trigger when the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin goes beyond ±0.3 mM from 25 s after standardization. Method: fNIRS signals were retrieved from patients undergoing knee surgery for anterior cruciate ligament repair under general anesthesia. Continuous fNIRS measures were measured from the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), which is known to be involved in evaluation of nociception, and the medial polar frontal cortex (mPFC), which are both involved in higher cortical functions (viz. cognition and emotion). Results: A ±0.3 mM threshold for painful/nociceptive events was observed during surgical incisions at least twice, forming a basis for a potential near-real-time recording of pain/nociceptive events. Evidence through observed true positives in S1 and true negatives in mPFC are linked through statistically significant correlations and this threshold. Conclusion: Our results show that standardizing and observing concentrations over 25 s using the ±0.3 mM threshold can be an arbiter of the continuous number of incisions performed on a patient, contributing to a potential intraoperative pain load index that correlates with post-operative levels of pain and potential pain chronification.

Indexed as

brainfNIRSmodelingnociceptionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35611143
PMCPMC9123643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.