Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35611065›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Severe hospital events following symptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants in France, December 2021-January 2022: A retrospective, population-based, matched cohort study.

Vincent Auvigne, Sophie Vaux, Yann Le Strat, Justine Schaeffer, Lucie Fournier, Cynthia Tamandjou, Charline Montagnat, Bruno Coignard, Daniel Levy-Bruhl, Isabelle Parent du Châtelet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincent AuvigneSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Sophie VauxSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Yann Le StratSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Justine SchaefferSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Lucie FournierSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Cynthia TamandjouSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Charline MontagnatSully Group, 3 av. Doyen Louis Weil, Grenoble 38000 France.
Bruno CoignardSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Daniel Levy-BruhlSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.
Isabelle Parent du ChâteletSanté publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, Saint-Maurice 94415 France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A rapid increase in incidence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (sub-lineage BA.1) occurred in France in December 2021, while the Delta variant was prevailing since July 2021. We aimed to determine whether the risk of a severe hospital event following symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection differs for Omicron versus Delta. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare severe hospital events (admission to intensive care unit or death) between Omicron and Delta symptomatic cases matched according to week of virological diagnosis and age. The analysis was adjusted for age, sex, vaccination status, presence of comorbidities and region of residence, using Cox proportional hazards model. Findings: Between 06/12/2021-28/01/2022, 184 364 cases were included, of which 931 had a severe hospital event (822 Delta, 109 Omicron). The risk of severe event was lower among Omicron versus Delta cases; the difference in severity between the two variants decreased with age (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR)=0·13 95%CI: 0·08-0·20 among 40-64 years, aHR=0·50 95%CI: 0·26-0.98 among 80+ years). The risk of severe event increased with the presence of comorbidities (for very-high-risk comorbidity, aHR=4·15 95%CI: 2·86-6·01 among 40-64 years) and in males (aHR=2·28 95%CI: 1·82-2·85among 40-64 years) and was higher in unvaccinated compared to primo-vaccinated (aHR=7·29 95%CI: 5·58-9·54 among 40-64 years). A booster dose reduced the risk of severe hospital event in 80+ years infected with Omicron (aHR=0·29; 95%CI: 0·12-0·69). Interpretation: This study confirms the lower severity of Omicron compared to Delta. However, the difference in disease severity is less marked in the elderly. Further studies are needed to better understand the interactions between age and severity of variants. Funding: The study was performed as part of routine work at Public Health France.

Indexed as

COVID-19DeltaEpidemiologyOmicronSARS-CoV-2Vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35611065
PMCPMC9121907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.