Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610726›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022

Applicability of a national strategy for patient-oriented research to people who use(d) substances: a Canadian experience.

Bernadette Pauly, Ginger Sullivan, Dakota Inglis, Fred Cameron, Jack Phillips, Conor Rosen, Bill Bullock, Jennifer Cartwright, Taylor Hainstock, Cindy Trytten and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette PaulyUniversity of Victoria School of Nursing, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, Canada. bpauly@uvic.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-1383
Ginger SullivanUniversity of Victoria School of Nursing, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, Canada.
Dakota InglisUniversity of Victoria, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, Canada.
Fred CameronSOLID Outreach Society, Victoria, Canada.
Jack PhillipsSOLID Outreach Society, Victoria, Canada.
Conor RosenUmbrella Society for Addictions and Mental Health, Victoria, Canada.
Bill BullockVictoria Division of Family Practice, Victoria, Canada.
Jennifer CartwrightBC Support Unit, Advancing Patient Oriented Research, Vancouver Island Regional Centre, Victoria, Canada.
Taylor HainstockBC Support Unit, Advancing Patient Oriented Research, Vancouver Island Regional Centre, Victoria, Canada.
Cindy TryttenIsland Health Authority, Victoria, Canada.
Karen UrbanoskiUniversity of Victoria, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, Victoria, Canada.
University of Victoria · CABC Research (Canada) · CAIsland Health · CA

Funding

island health regional health authority 26648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEurope and North America are in the grips of a devastating overdose crisis. People who use substances often feel unsafe to access healthcare due to fears of stigma, blame, judgement, poor treatment, or other repercussions. As a result, they often avoid, delay, or leave care, resulting in premature death and missed opportunities for care. Internationally, there have been concerted efforts to move towards patient-engaged research to enhance the quality of health care systems and services. In Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) initiative promotes engagement of patients as active partners in health care research. As part of a community based patient oriented research project, we critically analyze the SPOR framework to provide insights into what constitutes safer research with people who use(d) substances.

methodsWe undertook a two-stage process that began with a review of community based research principles and the SPOR framework. At the second stage, we undertook a qualitative descriptive study employing focus groups to generate description of the adequacy and appropriateness of the SPOR framework for guiding research with people who use(d) substances on four key dimensions (patient engagement, guiding principles, core areas of engagement and benefits). The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify key issues and insights.

resultsWhile the SPOR framework includes a range of patient roles, principles and areas for engagement, there are issues and gaps related to essential elements of safe patient-oriented research for people who use substances. These include an individualized focus on patients as partners, lack of recognition of community benefits, power imbalances and distrust due to systemic stigma, engagement as one way capacity building and learning, and lack of accountability for taking action on research findings.

conclusionsGiven the extent of stigma in health care and the ongoing illicit drug policy crisis, strategies for enhancing equitable Patient-Oriented Research (POR) include shifting language from patient partners to community researchers, recognizing power inequities and adding trust and equity as core POR principles including pay equity. Employing community based participatory research as a POR methodology allows the lead researchers to fully engage community throughout the research process, enhances community benefits and accountability for action.

Indexed as

Community based researchCommunity engagementPatient oriented researchPeople who use drugsPublic involvementSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35610726
PMCPMC9127478
OpenAlexW4281396786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.