Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610718›Full record

ReviewBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.

Qi Liu, Ze Liu, Hongbin Guo, Jieyu Liang, Yi Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Application and research progress of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial microsomia].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Progress in immunoregulatory mechanisms during distraction osteogenesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. Magnesium degradation-induced variable fixation plates promote bone healing in rabbits.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Bone Regenerate Evaluation Methods.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qi LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, China.
Ze LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, China.
Hongbin GuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, China.
Jieyu LiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, China. jamesliang8@aliyun.com.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, China. zhangyi0205@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4475-5769

Funding

FuQing Postdoc Program of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University 176National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102581National Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China 2021M693562Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2019JJ40517Provincial Outstanding Postdoctoral Innovative Talents Program of Hunan 2021RC2020Xiangya Hospital, Central South University 2020Q14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manual monitoring of callus with digital radiography (X-ray) is the primary bone healing evaluation, assessing the number of bridged callus formations. However, this method is subjective and nonquantitative. Recently, several quantitative monitoring methods, which could assess the recovery of the structure and biomechanical properties of the callus at different stages and the process of bone healing, have been extensively investigated. These methods could reflect the bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), stiffness, callus and bone metabolism at the site of bone lengthening. In this review, we comprehensively summarized the latest techniques for evaluating bone healing during distraction osteogenesis (DO): 1) digital radiography; 2) dual-energy X-ray scanning; 3) ultrasound; 4) quantitative computed tomography; 5) biomechanical evaluation; and 6) biochemical markers. This evidence will provide novel and significant information for evaluating bone healing during DO in the future.

Indexed as

Osteogenesis, DistractionBone DensityBony CallusHumansOsteogenesisTibiaTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiochemical markersBiomechanical evaluationCallusDistraction osteogenesisImagingQuantitative evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35610718
PMCPMC9128294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.