Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610716›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Health workers' use of routine health information and related factors at public health institutions in Illubabor Zone, Western Ethiopia.

Amanuel Benti Abdisa, Kifle Woldemichael Hajito, Dawit Wolde Daka, Meskerem Seboka Ergiba, Asaye Birhanu Senay, Ketema Lemma Abdi, Muluemebet Abera Wordofa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanuel Benti AbdisaChild Development and Sponsorship Project, Jimma Town, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Kifle Woldemichael HajitoDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Dawit Wolde DakaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. dave86520@gmail.com.
Meskerem Seboka ErgibaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Asaye Birhanu SenayDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Ketema Lemma AbdiCapacity Building Mentorship Partnership Program, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Muluemebet Abera WordofaFaculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProper utilization of health data has paramount importance for health service management. However, it is less practiced in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess routine health information utilization and identify factors associated with it among health workers in the Illubabor zone, Western Ethiopia.

methodsA facility based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2021 with a total of 423 randomly selected health workers. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire that was developed based on the performance of routine information system management (PRISM) framework. We created composite variables for health workers' knowledge, attitude, abilities, and information utilization based on existing data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed and the statistical association between the outcome and independent variables was declared using 95% CI and a P < 0.05.

resultsAbout two-thirds or 279 health workers (66.0%, 95% CI 61.3, 70.4) had good health information utilization. Two-thirds of health workers think organizational decision-making culture (67.1%, 95% CI 62.6, 71.5) and facility managers' or supervisors' promotion of information use (65.5%, 95% CI 60.9, 69.9) are positive. Over half of health workers (57.0%, 95% CI 52.2, 61.6) have a positive attitude toward data management, and the majority (85.8%, 95% CI 82.2, 88.9) believe they are competent of performing routine data analysis and interpretation activities. Only about two-thirds of health workers (65.5%, 95% CI 60.9, 69.9) were proficient in data analysis and interpretation.

conclusionsThe use of routine health information was lower than the national target and data from other literatures. Unacceptably large number of health personnel did not use information. As a result, efforts should be made to increase health workers' data management knowledge and skills, as well as the organizational culture of data utilization.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPublic HealthCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHealth WorkforceHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCultureEthiopiaHealth workersInformation useKnowledgePerceptionSkill

Identifiers

PMID35610716
PMCPMC9131521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.