ArticleBMC geriatrics2022
Gender differences regarding intention to use mHealth applications in the Dutch elderly population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smartphone-Based Passive Sensing in Monitoring Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Pooled it
- The Effect of Digital Literacy Training on Physical Activity App Acceptance and Behavioral Intentions Among Older Women: An Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Trial
- Public Knowledge, Practices, and Acceptance of Smart Health Technologies Addressing Antibiotic Use and Resistance in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reciprocal Relationship Between Cardiovascular Risk and Attainment of Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Targets in Users of a Mobile Health App.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Older Adults' Motivators and Barriers to Using Mindfulness Apps for Stress Management in Brain Health Interventions: Interview Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic differences in older adults' intention to use mhealth applications.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Influencing factors of continuance intention of medical applications for the elderly.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Thematic landscapes and temporal trends of disability technology adoption: insights from Structural Topic Modelling.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Technology Access, Pattern of Use, Interest in Digital Health, and Barriers to Tobacco Treatment Among HIV-Infected Smokers From Under-Resourced Communities: A Cross-Sectional Study.Tobacco use insights · 2026Article
- Older adults' adoption of shared service platforms outside long-term care insurance in Japan based on technology acceptance model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Methodological innovations in studying marginalized populations in research on neurodegeneration and ageing.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Smart Blister System with and without Mobile App Support: A Randomized Controlled Usability Trial.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Key Predictors of Adherence to a Mobile Health App for Managing Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Perception and Attitudes of Dental Professionals on Teledentistry: A Cross-Sectional Study.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Intention to use and perceived satisfaction with a digital tool for dementia prevention among the Dutch general public: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Exploring the Acceptability of Web-Based Health Modalities in Individuals With Hypertension: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Perspectives, willingness, and current use of mobile health (mHealth) by patients with cancer for remote monitoring during cancer treatment: a Dutch national cross-sectional survey.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers to adopting therapeutic virtual reality: the perspective of clinical psychologists and psychotherapists.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn light of the increasing demands in health care, a call has been made for the development of new strategies. One of these strategies is placing a higher emphasis on individuals, who are expected to better manage their own health and illness. mHealth applications could increase this self-management behaviour among older adults. However, it is crucial to know the intention to use mHealth of older adults before implementing these services. Even less is known regarding differences between genders on factors influencing this intention to use mHealth applications.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to study the gender differences regarding the relationship between technology acceptance factors and the intention to use mHealth applications in the Dutch elderly population.
methodsWe conducted a quantitative cross-sectional study using questionnaires. The participants were 65 years or older, lived independently or in a senior living facility, without cognitive impairment. Logistic regression with interaction terms was done to determine gender differences in the relationship between the intention to use mHealth applications and technology acceptance factors.
resultsWhile we found that half of the studied population had intention to use medical applications (50.3%) a notable difference was observed within gender groups which showed more men had intention to use medical applications rather than women (59.4% vs. 43.4% respectively). Adjusted logistic regression analysis per factor on the male and female part of the study population respectively showed that the factors Perceived usefulness (OR 21,69 and 2,39, resp.), Perceived ease of use (OR 7,21 and 2,74), Attitude toward use (OR 24,61 and 4,94), Sense of control (OR 4,12 and 2,67), Personal innovativeness (OR 2,54 and 1,58), Self-perceived effectiveness (OR 3,21 and 2,34), Service availability (OR 4,38 and 2,51) and Facilitating circumstances (OR 3,04 and 2,18) had a statistically significant influence on intention to use in both models. Logistic regression with interaction terms showed that two of the technology acceptance factors differed statistically significant in their relationship with intention to use when comparing females to males, namely Perceived usefulness (OR 0,11) and Attitude toward use (OR 0.24). Both factors were more strongly associated with intention to use for men compared to women.
conclusionPolicymakers and interventions aiming to stimulate the uptake of mHealth applications should acknowledge gender differences. Interventions based on improving the Perceived usefulness and Attitude toward use among female users could be a means to stimulate the full potential of medical applications and improve the uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.