Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610571›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Antimicrobial resistance in urinary pathogens and culture-independent detection of trimethoprim resistance in urine from patients with urinary tract infection.

Yinka M Somorin, Nichola-Jane M Weir, Sally H Pattison, Martin A Crockard, Carmel M Hughes, Michael M Tunney, Deirdre F Gilpin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mutation analysis of dihydrofolate reductase (Iranian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive Genomic Analysis of UropathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yinka M SomorinSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Nichola-Jane M WeirSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Sally H PattisonWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road,, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Martin A CrockardRandox Laboratories Ltd, 55 The Diamond Road, Crumlin, Northern Ireland.
Carmel M HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Michael M TunneySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Deirdre F GilpinSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland. d.f.gilpin@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough urinary tract infections (UTIs) are extremely common, isolation of causative uropathogens is not always routinely performed, with antibiotics frequently prescribed empirically. This study determined the susceptibility of urinary isolates from two Health and Social Care Trusts (HSCTs) in Northern Ireland to a range of antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of UTIs. Furthermore, we determined if detection of trimethoprim resistance genes (dfrA) could be used as a potential biomarker for rapid detection of phenotypic trimethoprim resistance in urinary pathogens and from urine without culture.

methodsSusceptibility of E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates (n = 124) to trimethoprim, amoxicillin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-amoxiclav and nitrofurantoin in addition to susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis (n = 61) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (n = 17) to trimethoprim was determined by ETEST® and interpreted according to EUCAST breakpoints. PCR was used to detect dfrA genes in bacterial isolates (n = 202) and urine samples(n = 94).

resultsResistance to trimethoprim was observed in 37/124 (29.8%) E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates with an MIC

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that molecular detection of dfrA genes is a good indicator of trimethoprim resistance without the need for culture and susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsUrinary Tract InfectionsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTrimethoprimTrimethoprim ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsTrimethoprimAntimicrobial prescriptiondfrARapid detectionTrimethoprim resistanceUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID35610571
PMCPMC9128081
OpenAlexW4281384050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.