ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2022
Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care?
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Perioperative outcomes of KangDuo versus Da Vinci robotic-assisted nephrectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System versus the da Vinci System: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyTrial
- Template-based pelvic lymph node dissection during lateral decubitus-positioned total retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: a step-by-step description of a surgical technique.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive One-Docking, Two-Target, and Three-Port Robotic-Assisted Nephroureterectomy: Redefining Surgical Approach.Cancers · 2025Article
- Open versus Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy: Contemporary Analysis from a Wide National Population-Based Database.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Adoption of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy permits a minimally invasive option for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in geriatric patients: comparison with non-geriatric patients with intermediate-term oncologic follow-up.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Narrative review of nephron-sparing surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: is there a role for distal ureterectomy, segmental ureterectomy, and partial nephrectomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Management of the distal ureter and bladder cuff at the time of nephroureterectomy: an overview of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Case report: Radical robotic nephroureterectomy after chemotherapy followed by avelumab in a patient with node-positive UTUC.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Robotic nephroureterectomy supplanting open and laparoscopic approach for upper tract urothelial carcinoma management: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes.Cancers · 2023Review
- Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. Current guidelines strongly recommend radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template-based lymph node dissection for all high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinomas. Although the open approach is still considered the standard of care, evolution of minimally invasive approaches especially the robotic-assisted approach, has been found to be oncologically equivalent. Since its initial description in 2006, the surgical technique as well as the robotic surgical system has gone through a major evolution. With well-established advantages of the minimally invasive approach, robotic radical nephroureterectomy also has the ability to address both upper and lower urinary tract simultaneously without the need of patient repositioning, standardized single docking technique, ease of performing crucial steps like excision of ureterovesical junction and bladder cuff with watertight cystotomy closure, allowing perioperative instillation of intra-vesical chemotherapy. Robot-assisted radical nephro-ureterectomy and template-based lymph node dissection is gradually emerging as the current standard of care to achieve the best possible oncologic and functional outcomes. In this review article we are focusing on the evolution of this approach in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma along with a review of oncologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35610528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.