Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610410›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2022

Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment.

Julia Föcker, Polly Atkins, Foivos-Christos Vantzos, Maximilian Wilhelm, Thomas Schenk, Hauke S Meyerhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia FöckerSchool of Psychology, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK. JFoecker@lincoln.ac.uk.
Polly AtkinsSchool of Psychology, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Foivos-Christos VantzosSchool of Psychology, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Maximilian WilhelmCenter for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SchenkLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hauke S MeyerhoffLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining object correspondence among multiple moving objects is an essential task of the perceptual system in many everyday life activities. A substantial body of research has confirmed that observers are able to track multiple target objects amongst identical distractors based only on their spatiotemporal information. However, naturalistic tasks typically involve the integration of information from more than one modality, and there is limited research investigating whether auditory and audio-visual cues improve tracking. In two experiments, we asked participants to track either five target objects or three versus five target objects amongst similarly indistinguishable distractor objects for 14 s. During the tracking interval, the target objects bounced occasionally against the boundary of a centralised orange circle. A visual cue, an auditory cue, neither or both coincided with these collisions. Following the motion interval, the participants were asked to indicate all target objects. Across both experiments and both set sizes, our results indicated that visual and auditory cues increased tracking accuracy although visual cues were more effective than auditory cues. Audio-visual cues, however, did not increase tracking performance beyond the level of purely visual cues for both high and low load conditions. We discuss the theoretical implications of our findings for multiple object tracking as well as for the principles of multisensory integration.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCuesMotion PerceptionVisual PerceptionAttentionHumansMotionPhotic StimulationAttention: object-basedMultisensory processingVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID35610410
PMCPMC9232473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.