Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610395›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

On the Road to Digital Pathology in Denmark-National Survey and Interviews.

Julie Smith, Sys Johnsen, Mette Christa Zeuthen, Lisbeth Koch Thomsen, Niels Marcussen, Stig Hansen, Charlotte Lerbech Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie SmithDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jusi@kp.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-1191
Sys JohnsenDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette Christa ZeuthenDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lisbeth Koch ThomsenCentre for Engineering and Science, University College Absalon, Næstved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7552-5974
Niels MarcussenDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-9361
Stig HansenDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Charlotte Lerbech JensenCentre for Engineering and Science, University College Absalon, Næstved, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology (DP) is changing pathology departments dramatically worldwide, yet globally, few departments are presently digitalized for the full diagnostic workflow. Denmark is also on the road to full digitalization countrywide, and this study aim to cover experiences during the implementation process in a national context. Thus, quantitative questionnaires were distributed to all pathology departments in Denmark (n = 13) and distributed to all professions including medical clinical directors, medical doctors (MD) and biomedical laboratory scientists (BLS). For a qualitative perspective, we interviewed four employees representing four professions. Data were collected in 2019-2020. From the questionnaire and interviews, we found strategies differed at the Danish departments with regards to ambitions, technological equipment, workflows, and involvement of type of professions. DP education was requested by personnel. Informants were in general positive toward the digital future but mainly had concerns regarding the political pressure to integrate DP before technological advances are sufficient for maintaining rational budgets, workflows, and for sustaining diagnostic quality. This study is a glance on the Danish implementation process in its early stages from personnel's point of view. It shows the complexity when large new workflow processes are to be implemented countrywide and with a large diversity of stakeholders like managers, MD, BLS, IT-professionals, and authorities. To ensure best technological and economical solutions and to maintain-or even optimize-diagnostic quality with DP and workflow alignment, we suggest superior inter- and intradepartmental communication. When implementing DP countrywide, a national working group is warranted with the variety of stakeholders represented.

Indexed as

WorkflowDenmarkHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital pathologyEnd-usersImplementationManagementQualitative

Identifiers

PMID35610395
PMCPMC9129899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.