Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610321›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Implementation of prehabilitation in colorectal cancer surgery: qualitative research on how to strengthen facilitators and overcome barriers.

Thea C Heil, Elisabeth J M Driessen, Tanja E Argillander, René J F Melis, Huub A A M Maas, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Johannes H W de Wilt, Barbara C van Munster, Marieke Perry

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehabilitation for cancer surgery: a systematic review of qualitative literature from experienced stakeholders.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for individuals with pancreatic cancer: a survey of healthcare professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prehabilitation for cancer surgery: perspectives of Australian patients, families, and health professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [App-based prehabilitation: implementation and adherence].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The implementation of preoperative optimization in British Columbia: a quality improvement initiative.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thea C HeilDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Thea.Zonneveld-Heil@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-2013
Elisabeth J M DriessenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tanja E ArgillanderDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
René J F MelisDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Huub A A M MaasDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Marcel G M Olde RikkertDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes H W de WiltDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Barbara C van MunsterDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marieke PerryDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLGelre Hospitals · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 80-85009-98-1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrehabilitation is increasingly offered to patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing surgery as it could prevent complications and facilitate recovery. However, implementation of such a complex multidisciplinary intervention is challenging. This study aims to explore perspectives of professionals involved in prehabilitation to gain understanding of barriers or facilitators to its implementation and to identify strategies to successful operationalization of prehabilitation.

methodsIn this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were performed with healthcare professionals involved in prehabilitation for patients with CRC. Prehabilitation was defined as a preoperative program with the aim of improving physical fitness and nutritional status. Parallel with data collection, open coding was applied to the transcribed interviews. The Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) framework, a comprehensive interdisciplinary model guide to promote implementation of research findings into healthcare practice, was used to categorize obtained codes and structure the barriers and facilitators into relevant themes for change.

resultsThirteen interviews were conducted. Important barriers were the conflicting scientific evidence on (cost-)effectiveness of prehabilitation, the current inability to offer a personalized prehabilitation program, the complex logistic organization of the program, and the unawareness of (the importance of) a prehabilitation program among healthcare professionals and patients. Relevant facilitators were availability of program coordinators, availability of physician leadership, and involving skeptical colleagues in the implementation process from the start.

conclusionsImportant barriers to prehabilitation implementation are mainly related to the intervention being complex, relatively unknown and only evaluated in a research setting. Therefore, physicians' leadership is needed to transform care towards more integration of personalized prehabilitation programs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: By strengthening prehabilitation programs and evidence of their efficacy using these recommendations, it should be possible to enhance both the pre- and postoperative quality of life for colorectal cancer patients during survivorship.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansPreoperative ExerciseQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeColorectal cancerComplex interventionImplementation,PrehabilitationQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35610321
PMCPMC9130002
OpenAlexW4281483178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.