ArticleScientific reports2022
Surrogate vascular input function measurements from the superior sagittal sinus are repeatable and provide tissue-validated kinetic parameters in brain DCE-MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrafast Blood TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Automatic detection of arterial input function for brain DCE-MRI in multi-site cohorts.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Non-invasive PD-L1 stratification in non-small cell lung cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.European radiology · 2025Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor growth of sporadic vestibular schwannomas: A prospective study.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Determining Disease Activity and Glucocorticoid Response in Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy: Preliminary Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Measurement variability of blood-brain barrier permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Highly Accelerated Prostate MR Dispersion Imaging.Cancers · 2024Article
- Blood-brain barrier integrity is linked to cognitive function, but not to cerebral arterial pulsatility, among elderly.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Low-dose GBCA administration for brain tumour dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: a feasibility study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Novel Multi-Model High Spatial Resolution Method for Analysis of DCE MRI Data: Insights from Vestibular Schwannoma Responses to Antiangiogenic Therapy in Type II Neurofibromatosis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate vascular input function (VIF) derivation is essential in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. The optimum site for VIF estimation is, however, debated. This study sought to compare VIFs extracted from the internal carotid artery (ICA) and its branches with an arrival-corrected vascular output function (VOF) derived from the superior sagittal sinus (VOF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.