ArticleScientific reports2022
Application of nanoindentation technology in testing the mechanical properties of skull materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Vertebral Body Bone Quality in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Using Micro-CT, qBEI, and Nanoindentation-A Case Study.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Experimentally validated finite element model for mechanical and fracture characteristics of SiCN thin films under different loads.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Decellularized Biohybrid Nerve Promotes Motor Axon Projections.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Effect of Strain Rate on Nano-Scale Mechanical Behavior of A-Plane (112¯0) ZnO Single Crystal by Nanoindentation.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Isolated Effects of Bone, Spring and Surgical Parameters on the Surgical Outcome in Spring-Assisted Sagittal Synostosis Correction.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-point bending test, compression test and tensile test can detect the mechanical properties of the whole layer of skull, but cannot detect the mechanical properties of the inner plate, the diploe and the outer plate of the skull. In this study, nanoindentation technology was applied to detect mechanical properties of micro-materials of the skull, and differences in micro-mechanical properties of the inner, diploe and outer plates of the skull and cranial suture of human carcasses at different ages were analyzed. The differences in hardness (HIT) and modulus of elasticity (E) were statistically significant among different age groups (P < 0.01). In terms of structure, the E of diploe was higher than that of other structures, while HIT had no significant statistical difference. In terms of location, both HIT and E showed that left frontal (LF) was significantly higher than coronal suture (CS). The above results were consistent with the multi-factor ANOVAs. In addition, the multi-factor ANOVAs further explained the interaction of HIT and E with age, location and structure. It was believed that the nanoindentation technique could be used to analyze laws of micromechanical properties of different structures of human cadaveric skull and cranial suture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.