Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35610209›Full record

ReviewBone research2022

Progress in osteoarthritis research by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Yusheng Li, Wenqing Xie, Wenfeng Xiao, Dou Dou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cuproptosis and its potential role in musculoskeletal disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Osteoarthritis: pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yusheng LiDeparment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3404-0807
Wenqing XieDeparment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9810-7372
Wenfeng XiaoDeparment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Dou DouDepartment of Health Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, 100085, China. doudou@nsfc.gov.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) in China is gradually becoming an important scientific research area that has had a significant impact on research and development (R&D) activities in the OA field worldwide. This article summarizes the R&D progress related to OA in China in recent years. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is a national funding institution for basic research and plays a critical role in promoting and supporting Chinese scholars' R&D activities. We collected and analyzed information on NSFC funding in the field of OA from 2010 to 2019, including the amount, the level and the program categories of the funded projects. The data fully demonstrate the important and positive role of the NSFC in supporting free exploration, cultivating research teams and young talent, and boosting OA R&D. In this article, we outline and discuss hot topics in focused areas, key advances in this field and the prospects for progress in OA research in China.

Identifiers

PMID35610209
PMCPMC9130253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.